Reasoning, Reasoning ( A ) - 1745 Words

Reasoning Reasoning (A) This court’s reasoning clarifies the ambiguity and responds to the defendant’s appeal regarding the application of â€Å"learned intermediary† into 3 sections. 1. Defining â€Å"Learned Intermediary† and what it means to the case in South Dakota Law. 2. How this applies to the deceit claim 3. How this applies to the failure to warn claim Learned Intermediary doctrine places the responsibility on the manufacturer to clearly warn physicians of the risks of their product. In this case, it was clear that the company had neglected to include key information that could have changed the decision of the plaintiff as well as the Physician’s recommendation for treatment. The court explained that the doctrine does not allow the†¦show more content†¦The plaintiff who is making this claim is required to provide proof of an intentional misrepresentation or concealment of a fact on which plaintiff relied and that caused an injury to plaintiff. Northwestern Pub. Serv. v. Union Carbide Corp., 236 F. Supp. 2d 966, 973-74 (D.S.D. 2002); see also Arnoldy v. Mahoney, 791 N.W.2d 645, 660 (S.D. 2010). The court decided that based on the facts laid out by the prosecution, there was more than sufficient evidence to meet the standard for deceit. †¢ The testimony of Owens stating she was aware of the risks that the plaintiff experienced and that this was not included in the warning labels of the product. †¢ Another Ethicon medical director’s testimony, Hinoul, stating the brochure did not include warnings for some of the symptoms the plaintiff experience. †¢ The consistent neglect of Ethicon that resulted in the delay of printing of the warnings on labels despite them receiving the information before the product’s launch, all because they did not want to delay the product launch. The delay in adding these warnings which was supposed to be added after the first batch but was not added until 2008 when courts ordered them to do so. †¢ The plaintiff even went to the defendant’s website in an attempt to educate herself beyond what was provided to her by her Physician and yet these symptoms were not listed. If the information the physician had wasShow MoreRelatedThe Theory Of Moral Reasoning903 Words   |  4 Pagesinvolves evaluating the acceptability of an action, given the virtues held by a specific culture (Haidt, 2001). Moral reasoning involves the conscious, effortful, and controllable mental manipulation of information, while moral emotions involve spontaneous, affectively charged judgements that lack conscious reasoning (Haidt, 2001). While earlier rationalist approaches argued that moral reasoning formed the basis of our moral judgements (Kohlberg, 1981), more recent approaches, such as Haidt’s (2001) SocialRead MoreError in Human Reasoning Essay976 Words   |  4 PagesError in Human Reasoning Although humans are the only animals that reason, we do not follow probability theory, a normative model, very closely in our everyday reasoning. The conjunction fallacy is one of the major errors that humans commit when dealing with problems that involve probability. Exemplified by Linda the feminist bank teller, this problem occurs when we assume that a conjunction of two premises is more likely than one or more of the premises alone. According to probabilityRead MoreSelf Esteem and Moral Reasoning867 Words   |  4 Pagesor natural intelligence influence a person’s stage of moral reasoning? If I might be forgiven for incorporating concepts from my prior answer and apply them to this question, I’ll add that the biological influences that guide cognitive development will likely come into play as a child matures. In spite of any positive or negative influences of the past, certain biological conditions could play a significant role in how any moral reasoning may develop. Any number of the cognitive-behavioral disordersRead MoreLogical Reasoning Of Computer Science1816 Words   |  8 Pages1 - Report Logical Reasoning And Number Systems and/or Assembly Language Student Name: Ioannis Violitzopoulos Student ID: 1115297262 Course: Computer Science Program Leader: Liz Gandy Module: CET105 Computational Thinking Table of Contents Logical Reasoning 3 Logical Reasoning in Computer Science. 3 What is Logical Reasoning? 3 Why we use Logical Reasoning? 4 Types of Logical Reasoning 4 Deductive Reasoning 4 Inductive Reasoning 5 Abductive Reasoning 5 Wrong can be RightRead MoreCritical Thinking Reasoning Is Relevant And Reliable Essay1003 Words   |  5 Pagesreliable. The critical thinking process consists of reasoning which is the process in which we think. This way of thinking has several different aspects. Reasoning is done from a certain point of view and based on data, information and evidence. Reasoning is expressed through and shapes by concepts and ideas. Reasoning also uses inferences and interpretations to draw conclusions and give meaning to data. When it comes to critical thinking reasoning is not the only part of critical thinking. When thinkingRead MoreCritical Thinking: Reasoning and Inference Essays2817 Words   |  12 Pagessociology. Economics, biology, geography, and grammar all have objects of knowledge which they investigate, describe, and try to explain. Critical thinking involves a knowledge of the science of logic, including the skills of logical analysis, correct reasoning, and understanding statistical methods. Critical thinking, however, involves more than just an understanding of logical procedures. A good critical thinker must also understand the sources of knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and the nature ofRead More Mills Inductive Reasoning Essay1539 Words   |  7 Pages Mill’s Inductive reasoning Mills method of agreement identifies a cause of an event in terms of its sufficient condition. When using this method, one searches for a single factor that is common to multiple situations in which the same event occurred. Mill says that, when two or more occurrences of the event under investigation have only one condition in common, then that condition is the cause of the event. (Mill, 2002) More simply stated, Mills method of agreement eliminates all but oneRead MoreInductive Vs. Inductive Reasoning1690 Words   |  7 PagesAlthough inductive reasoning is– as we shall see - not logically continuous, it is nevertheless a seemingly parsimonious avenue for the formation of theories and conceptions about the world around us. The sun has risen and fallen every day up until this point in time and while this may not logically prove that it will do the same tomorrow, the popular belief is that this repetition gives us a firm ontological grounding for expecting it to do so. This does not seem unreasonable, at least in one senseRead MoreDescartes Philosophy : Descartes s Western Philosophical Reasoning985 Words   |  4 Pagessays Descartes. The first two meditations out of Descartes’s six, gives the reader general ideas of Descartes’s western philosophical reasoning. Meditation one focuses on removing any doubts in the mind and meditation two focuses on how the mind is better than the body. I will describe Descartes’s major points for meditations one and two by gives rational reasoning to truly support the major claims that he is making. Descartes starts his argument by saying that he must start with new stronger premisesRead MoreInvestigating the ‚Äà ²Belief Bias‚Äà ´ Effect in Human Reasoning2935 Words   |  12 PagesInvestigating the ‘Belief Bias’ Effect in Human Reasoning Abstract In this report an experiment was conducted to investigate the belief bias effect in human reason, the weighting attached to logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Belief biases were observed despite controls for conversion of premises. Belief bias was shown to be more marked in the invalid than the valid syllogisms. This consistent interaction between belief and logic was also noted. However, participants were intermediate